Search for: "Mark A. Lemley"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2017, 11:45 am
Mark A. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:29 am
Mark A. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
Joe Mullin writes of the Supreme Court on Bilski:Whichever side Stevens is on, the long delay likely means there is disagreement among the justices, says Stanford Law professor Mark Lemley. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 9:22 pm
In part 1 of my interview with Mark Lemley we discussed whether the Supreme Court will take the i4i v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:03 pm
Mark A. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 7:51 am
Mark A. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
No, explains Mark Lemley (Stanford Law) in his newly posted article, The Myth of the Sole Inventor. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 1:09 pm
See the post Did Mark Lemley name Gary Boone as the inventor of the integrated circuit? [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:35 am
Lee includes the textNew data from the legal analytics firm Lex Machina suggests that the newfound judicial hostility toward software patents is making plaintiffs gunshy (...)But one obvious explanation for the apparent trend is that the Alice decision (and the related rulings from lower courts that followed) spooked software patent plaintiffs.That's the view of Stanford legal scholar (and Lex Machina co-founder) Mark Lemley. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:17 pm
Posted by Mark Lemley and Carl Shapiro We recently released a paper about standard-essential patents, "A Simple Approach to Setting Reasonable Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents", at http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/frand.pdf. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:21 pm
That the 271Blog disclosed the conflict in August 2008 prior to IPBiz (in February 2009), when in fact IPBiz disclosed the conflict in April 2008, prior to mention on the 271BlogThe topic of Mark Lemley arose in the Merrit article on Kappos because Merritt quoted Lemley on Kappos:"The PTO is in crisis, and I think Dave Kappos understands that, and will work creatively to try to find ways out of the crisis," said Mark A. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:46 pm
Mark A. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:44 pm
This is the same Mark Lemley who proclaimed Gary Boone to be the inventor of the integrated circuit [IC] in the Stanford Law Review, who reversed himself (in the presence of no additional information) on Robert Clarke's analysis of patent grant rate, and who asserted that the inventors of the transistor thought it only good for hearing aids, based on a non-existent article in the New York Times. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:31 pm
Mark Lemley is the William H. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:48 am
For example, regarding Thomas Edison, Lemley’s primary case illustrating the so-called “myth of the sole inventor,” he alleges that “Sawyer and Man invented and patented the incandescent light bulb” (Lemley 2011, p26) and that “Edison did not invent the light bulb in any meaningful sense” (Lemley 2011, p25). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:27 am
Mark A. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:43 pm
MARK A. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:23 pm
Mark Lemley is the William H. [read post]
13 May 2010, 9:12 am
Lemley and Mark P. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Eugene Volokh (University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law), Mark A. [read post]
