Search for: "Mark LaBelle" Results 21 - 40 of 7,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2009, 12:08 pm
In a recent law journal article authored about FDA approved labels and off-label uses, authors Mark Herrmann (of the [druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com]) and Pearson Bownas demonstrate the folly of letting the standard of care in medical malpractice cases be defined by whether the doctor used a prescription product "on label" or "off label. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
And of course, labeling your design as "Patent Pending" does not give you any patent rights. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:34 am
The court's recent decisions stress how important it is for patentees to monitor and update their labeling and other marking activities, particularly as patents expire.In June, the court affirmed a summary judgment decision in favor of Solo Cup related to the company's practice of marking patents on beverage cup lids, and addressed whether each decision to mark or each article falsely marked is an act of false marking under the statute. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 7:16 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Drug companies are NOT free to advertise off label uses. [read post]
16 May 2023, 9:04 pm by Coral Beach
In announcing a draft compliance guide for FDA staff on enforcement about major food allergen labeling the agency has missed the mark with a comment about sesame activities, according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:00 pm
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently issued a final rule that marks a major shift in the regulatory landscape for labeling that has already begun to impact other regulatory bodies—namely, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:00 pm
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently issued a final rule that marks a major shift in the regulatory landscape for labeling that has already begun to impact other regulatory bodies—namely, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:00 pm
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently issued a final rule that marks a major shift in the regulatory landscape for labeling that has already begun to impact other regulatory bodies—namely, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:00 pm
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently issued a final rule that marks a major shift in the regulatory landscape for labeling that has already begun to impact other regulatory bodies—namely, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:00 pm
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently issued a final rule that marks a major shift in the regulatory landscape for labeling that has already begun to impact other regulatory bodies—namely, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:00 pm
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently issued a final rule that marks a major shift in the regulatory landscape for labeling that has already begun to impact other regulatory bodies—namely, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:57 am by Andrew Hudson
The two types of country of origin labels which companies selling food in Australia must comply with are the standard mark and the country of origin statement. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am by Bexis
  Off-label use is legal and generally accepted. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 10:11 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Cyber Trust Mark” in the form of a distinct shield logo applied to products meeting established cybersecurity criteria. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
  This time, it’s off-label use.We’ll polish off the lesser of the two off-label use decisions quickly. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:57 pm by Mark A. Strauss
Pharmaceutical firm Danco Labs allegedly imported products lacking country-of-origin labels from China yet failed to pay the 10% “marking duties” it owed. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Strohmeyer & Arpe Co., 243 N.Y. 458 (1926), held that “the statute confers a right of action upon an ultimate purchaser against the person who originally prepared for market and sold the containers with false labels or statements of their contents” and “no one doubts that the statute by express provision might give to an ultimate purchaser of falsely labeled containers however remote a right of action against the person who violated the statute by marketing… [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:23 am
(citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 5:34 pm by Howard Bashman
“Roberts’ Supreme Court defies easy political labels”: Mark Sherman and Jessica Gresko of The Associated Press have this report. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 10:58 am
If you have been the owner of a successful brand (unless you are Amazon), you may squirm, or worse, at the answer.by Neil Wilkof Photo on lower left by Mark Marathon and is licensed under the Creative Commons/Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 unported license. [read post]