Search for: "Mark S. Wallach"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
” Mark Landler and Maggie Haberman of The New York Times report that “all four of President Trump’s candidates for the Supreme Court are white, middle-aged federal appeals court judges with reliably conservative legal records. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:41 am
It would seem that Fanon’s critique, launched in the very midst of a war because of which it had precious few ears to hear it in the metropole, has not yet found its mark so many years later. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 6:42 am
One’s Schadenfreude (delight at the misfortune of another) or by reference to one’s standing resentment at an insult. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:54 pm
Judge Wallach views the majority's analysis as a re-weighing of evidence:The majority does not explain why this evidence is insufficientto support the PTAB’s finding. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
Figure 7 avove from the prior art shows the issue: The portion marked in yellow defines the claimed valve assembly and the top red valve is the location of the required inlet seat. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:16 am
A conference 10 months in the making…and it’s finally here! [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:16 am
A conference 10 months in the making…and it’s finally here! [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
Mark Walsh provides a “view” from the courtroom for this blog. [read post]
24 May 2017, 8:37 am
” In considering the likelihood of confusion of the marks, the Board did not consider Fairmont’s actual use of its mark that placed the word INSIGNIA in a dominant format – raising the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
5 May 2017, 9:12 am
The USPTO also formally intervened in the case and designated Mark Freeman from the DOJ Civil Division’s Appellate Staff to argue. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
At the Sports Law Blog, Daniel Wallach handicaps the chances that the court will grant review in in Christie v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
A mark’s purpose — to identify the source of goods — is antithetical to the notion that a trademark is tied to the government. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:42 am
Where I differ from Wallach is in short-term recommendations. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
United States, 371 U.S. 156, 167 (1962) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:41 pm
Two members (O’Malley and Wallach) of the eight-judge majority would have gone even further, arguing that Section 2(a) also violates the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
A mark’s purpose — to identify the source of goods — is antithetical to the notion that a trademark is tied to the government. [read post]
Free Speech: Prohibition on Registering Disparaging Marks is Unconstitutional, Federal Circuit Rules
22 Dec 2015, 11:58 am
” Judge Lourie also questions whether a mark’s protection should count as even commercial speech. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 7:12 am
Wallach Professor at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 12:33 pm
Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks and citationomitted). [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:24 pm
Judge Wallach's dissent-in-part:I agree with the majority’s holdingswith respect to standing, infringement, and willfulness. [read post]
