Search for: "Mark Toy"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2016, 1:20 pm
The presentation marked the end of the bank’s Holiday Food & Toy drive, an annual event that supports ... [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:08 am
" The case is Manley Toys Ltd v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:13 am
The action involved the following logos: While recognizing that it would be ‘unlikely in the extreme’ for an average Canadian consumer, even a casual one somewhat in a hurry, to conclude that a well-known toy retailer had branched out into cannabis dispensary services – such that trademark infringement and passing-off had not occurred – the Court determined that Toys R Us’ had satisfied all four elements of the test for depreciation of goodwill: the… [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:13 am
The action involved the following logos: While recognizing that it would be ‘unlikely in the extreme’ for an average Canadian consumer, even a casual one somewhat in a hurry, to conclude that a well-known toy retailer had branched out into cannabis dispensary services – such that trademark infringement and passing-off had not occurred – the Court determined that Toys R Us’ had satisfied all four elements of the test for depreciation of goodwill: the… [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 2:10 pm
In its 48th citable decision of 2006, the Board granted a petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark RAD RODS (Stylized) for "mechanical action toy vehicles" [RODS disclaimed], finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark RAD RIGS [RIGS disclaimed] for "toy vehicles and accessories therefor. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
Hot off the press is a recent trade mark decision from IPEC about children's toys. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:06 am
So we are back to litigation over dog chew toys. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark MAGIC SNOWBALL for "plush toy which looks like a snowball and contains a motion-activated LED" [SNOWBALL disclaimed] finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark SNOWBALL for "plush toys. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 8:20 am
Buying Outside Age-Recommendations for Toys “This toy is marked age 8 and older, but my 5 ½ year old is up for challenging toys . [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 9:15 pm
Mark Steyn revisits the subject of Kinder Surprise eggs, the chocolate-wrapped toys popular in much of the rest of the world but forbidden under a distinctive U.S. law which bans the “embedding of non-nutritive items” in confectionery. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 9:15 am
Toy maker Hasbro has been rebuked by the EU General Court, after it was found to have applied to register an EU trademark (EUTM) for MONOPOLY in bad faith. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 3:03 am
The Detroit Tigers make a visit to the Hot Stove League with an opposition to registration of the mark BUILD-A-TIGER for plush and stuffed toys and accessories therefor, clothing for stuffed and plush toys, and related retail store services. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:20 am
VIP Products creates a dog toy line called “Silly Squeakers” which are squeaking toys that look like the Jack Daniel’s square-shaped bottle of Old No. 7 Whiskey but replace the Jack Daniel’s wording. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
Seldom had a toy served such a role as well. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:22 am
The packaging also gets low marks for encouraging children to “fight alongside men in a war to end all wars. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:48 am
In its ruling in 2020, the Ninth Circuit said VIP’s dog toy mimicking a Jack Daniel’s whiskey bottle was an expressive work entitled to First Amendment protection, reversing the district court’s initial holding that the toy infringed and diluted Jack Daniel’s marks and remanding the case back to the district court for a determination on the merits of the infringement claim. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:48 am
In its ruling in 2020, the Ninth Circuit said VIP’s dog toy mimicking a Jack Daniel’s whiskey bottle was an expressive work entitled to First Amendment protection, reversing the district court’s initial holding that the toy infringed and diluted Jack Daniel’s marks and remanding the case back to the district court for a determination on the merits of the infringement claim. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:23 am
Mark Pryor’s role in CPSIA is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 2:54 pm
The mark is also sought for use in association with various clothing, table ware and dog toys, as well as the services of “wine event sponsorships and dog event sponsorships”. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:11 am
Specifically, Diece-Lisa argued a “reverse confusion theory,” alleging that Disney’s Lots-o’-Huggin’ Bear flooded the toy market and swallowed Diece-Lisa’s mark, thereby confusing consumers into thinking the “Lots of Hugs” mark came from Disney. [read post]
