Search for: "Marks v. Cross"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2022, 8:42 am
Hartigan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 1:02 pm
GotNews Twitter Defamation Claim Defeated by a Question Mark–Boulger v. [read post]
Service Mark Infringement Lawsuit Filed In Los Angeles By Trademark Attorneys For Couples For Christ
20 Aug 2008, 8:16 am
" The case is titled Couples For Christ, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 5:16 pm
As pictured and described in a report on the lawsuit by NJ Advance Media, the memorial depicts a soldier kneeling over a grave marked by a cross. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
Last Friday, the High Court granted special leave to appeal in 2 trade mark matters: Health World Ltd v Shin-Sun Australia Pty Ltd E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited Given only about 80 cases a year score this level of achievement, there are obviously big issues afoot. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
In American Humanist Association v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:13 am
Case citation: Elliott v. [read post]
13 May 2017, 7:36 pm
In the case, plaintiffs brought an Establishment Clause challenge to a war memorial on public property depicting a soldier kneeling over a grave marked by a Christian cross. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm
In my case note on Schütz (UK) Ltd v Werit (UK) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 303 (29 March 2011) of 2 April 2011 in this blog and in my note on Schutz (UK) Ltd and Another v Delta Containers Ltd and Another [2011] EWHC 1173 (Pat) (5 May 2011) in IP North West I referred to the practice of cross-bottling. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:33 am
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:13 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear argument in American Legion v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm
On some of the World War I battlefields she has visited, she told Katyal, Stars of David – rather than crosses – mark the graves of Jewish soldiers. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:52 am
Leonid Nahshin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:36 am
Mark Guthier, director of the Wisconsin Union, cross-appeals on the grounds that the trial court improperly revised its original restrictions against Penkalski in response to [...] [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:29 am
Cross-reference: Application of E.I. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:58 am
Rau, Mark G. and Judy G. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
Z T (Kosovo) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2009] UKHL 6 (4 February 2009) Holmes-Moorhouse(FC) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (Original Appellants and Cross-respondents) [2009] UKHL 7 (4 February 2009) Marks and Spencer plc (Appellants) v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Respondents) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:00 am
In the case of Monster Energy Company v Glamco Co, Ltd [2018] SGHC 238, the High Court was faced with the primary question of whether Glamco’s trade mark “SWEET MONSTER” in Class 30 was registrable in Singapore even though Monster Energy had earlier trade mark registrations for the word “MONSTER” (and variations thereof) in several classes in Singapore (section 8(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
The Claimant cross appealed on “the fact of the relationship”, contending that publication of this should be restrained until trial or the determination of the factual disputes between the parties. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 9:17 pm
In today’s case (Mclaren v. [read post]
