Search for: "Marks v. Hudson" Results 21 - 40 of 302
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 4:18 am by Emma Snell
Missy Ryan, John Hudson, Louisa Loveluck and David Stern report for the Washington Post. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
Like the US Supreme Court in Tam and Brunetti, the Federal Circuit in Elster declined to decide whether trademark laws that regulate speech based on its content are subject to “strict scrutiny and the compelling government interest test, or Central Hudson’s intermediate scrutiny and the substantial government interest test. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
The Guardian reports on the ongoing defamation claim between Clive Palmer and Mark McGowan. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
One Menacing Call After Another: Threats against lawmakers surge Yahoo News – Catie Edmondson and Mark Walker (New York Times) | Published: 2/9/2022 The New York Times reviewed more than 75 indictments of people charged with threatening lawmakers since 2016. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
In December, the German frigate Bayern crossed the South China Sea, marking the first German naval deployment to the Indo-Pacific in nearly 20 years. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
In December, the German frigate Bayern crossed the South China Sea, marking the first German naval deployment to the Indo-Pacific in nearly 20 years. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
And even if viewed as a regulation of purely commercial speech – and therefore not subject to strict scrutiny – the restriction would at least have to pass muster under the Supreme Court’s test in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Drawing in witnesses When the Court recognized a public right of access to criminal trials, in Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 11:04 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Enrico Bonadio, Protecting Art in the Street (Dokument Press 2020)Jane Ginsburg, Deep Dive: Burrow-Giles Lithographing v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
After the Court of Appeal had dismissed their appeal, Steel and Morris took their case to the European Court of Human Rights, with the assistance of their pro bono legal team (Keir Starmer, Anthony Hudson and Mark Stephens). [read post]