Search for: "Marks v. James*"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2009, 4:21 am
MARK A. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 8:40 am
JACKSON V. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:05 pm
”) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); Titus v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:34 am
V. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:41 am
Cir.2016) (internal quotation marks omitted); see 13A CharlesAlan Wright & Arthur R. [read post]
14 May 2011, 2:58 am
Steneken v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
V. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:03 pm
I am not sure why Percheron chose to send you and Mark this letter. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:28 am
See Cox v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm
The Court in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:53 pm
GOLDMAN V. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
Cox v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 10:17 am
Division of Youth and Family Services v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:08 am
Mark MaGrann Assocs., 388 N.J. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
G.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
Mason v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
In this issue Prof Karjiker provides his perspective on Herbal Zone v Infitech, a triumvirate of talent from CIPC (Sher-Muhammad Kahn, Christiaan Steyn and Warren Rossouw) unpack shape marks in a comprehensive exposé, Chezanne Haighfrom Kisch IP takes a bite at the Kit Kat four finger decision, Darren Olivier provides tips for franchising, Alessia del Bianco provides an in-house perspective on creative IP management, Darren Margo is relaxed over the latest exchange… [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
At Slate, Judith Schaeffer marks the forty-eighth anniversary of the Court’s decision in Loving v. [read post]