Search for: "Martin Cooper v. CIR"
Results 21 - 40
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2018, 7:04 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Martin T. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:38 pm
See also Cooper v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 6:04 pm
Cooper Elec. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 563 F. 3d 171, 178 (6th Cir 2009); Westberry v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:48 pm
Martin, 454 F.Supp.2d 1085, 1094 (E.D.Wash.2006). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:56 am
McGuire, 45 F.3d 1177 (8th Cir. 1995). [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:08 pm
The Beard Test Both sides in the Martin case appealed to the so-called Beard test in Beard v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 6:46 am
Cooper Electric Supply Co., 940 F.2d 896 (3d Cir. 1991). [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
Oliver, 397 F.3d 369 (6th Cir. 2/2/05), was released the day before United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:48 pm
Cir. 1995)]; see also Schwarzenegger [v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Warren Co., 134 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir. 1998); Myers v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 764 N.E.2d 35, 42 (Ill. 2002) (applied to medical device); Martin v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 8:07 am
Tom Kohler and Kevin McGrath are director and associate, respectively, at Downs Rachlin Martin, PLLC which represented the Patent Owner in Galaxia Electronics Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Schwarz Pharma, Inc., 702 F.3d 177, 186 (5th Cir. 2012) (design defect claims are “failure-to-warn claims under different names” and preempted) (applying Louisiana law); Frazier v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
App. 1989); Cooper v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
" Martin v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:39 am
Sparks, No. 14-12075 (11th Cir. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Her dissertation title is, however, as Martin Short would say, a bit of a tell. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court, however, cited the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in Barcelona.com, Inc v Excelentisimo Ayuntamiento de Barcelona, 330 F.3d 616 (4th Cir,. 2003, here) and the Second Circuit ruling in ITC Ltd v Punchgini, 482 F.3d 135 (2d Cir. 2007) (the Bukhara case, here) to the effect that those provisions give non-US parties rights that are coextensive with, not greater than, those otherwise provided under the Lanham Act. [read post]
