Search for: "Martinez v. Attorney General, United States" Results 21 - 40 of 201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2021, 10:18 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 556 U.S. 129, 137 (2009), by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, see McKeever v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
It held that the  general rule in New York is that marital fault should not be considered in determining equitable distribution. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Office of the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 19-1031Issue: Whether federal law preempts the application of state and local labor laws to the terms and conditions of participation in the federal au pair program. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:19 am by Chris Wesner
§ 1334 and Amended General Order 05-02 entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, referring all bankruptcy matters to this Court. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:03 pm by Arslan Sheikh
By Arslan Sheikh “OK, Boomer,” a meme popularized by younger generations on social media, made its first (and likely only) appearance in the United States Supreme Court last month. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Separately, District of Columbia Attorney General Karl A. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:24 pm
Vivianne del Rio - she is an ASA and has been with the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office (SAO) for her entire 26 year career. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
 at ___ (Martinez, J., dissenting).In this Court, the Borrowers assert the same substantive arguments that they did in the court of appeals. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December  in In Re United States. [read post]