Search for: "Matrixx Initiatives Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2014, 3:35 pm by Barry Barnett
Ct. 2459 (2014); Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:29 am by Schachtman
The notorious Wells[4] case was cited by the Supreme Court in Matrixx Initiatives[5] for the proposition that statistical significance was unnecessary. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Supreme Court & Louisiana Supreme Court – OTC drug preemption, Mary Carter settlement evidence·                     Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 3:22 am by Schachtman
  Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am by Schachtman
  In In re Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:35 pm by Schachtman
  Indeed, the Supreme Court itself joined the trend in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 1:40 pm by Schachtman
” The government has gone from one extreme of painting, broad brush, that statistical significance is not important or necessary (in Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:52 am by Andrew Trask
Because materiality is an essential element of a Rule 10b–5 claim, see Matrixx Initiatives, 563 U. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 11:53 am by Schachtman
Siracusano 30A-9 [A] : Sequelae of Matrixx Initiatives 30A-12 [B] : Is Statistical Significance Necessary? [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
§ 78u-4 (“Reform Act”), should be applied less rigorously in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by Andrew Trask
Halliburton Company, which held that a securities plaintiff need not prove loss causation in order to secure class certification; Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
Recent and Upcoming Supreme Court Decisions In 2011, the Supreme Court decided three significant securities cases: Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]