Search for: "Matter of Apple" Results 21 - 40 of 7,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2023, 9:49 am by Raymond G. Lahoud
The agreement, announced on Nov. 9, 2023, highlights the company’s illegal discrimination against both U.S. citizens …The post Landmark $25 Million Agreement: Apple Settles Discrimination Allegations with the Justice Department appeared first on Immigration Matters. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:41 am by Steven
Justice Department over alleged collusion in the pricing of e- books, according to two people familiar with the matter. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:26 pm by Florian Mueller
It must have hurt.No matter what Apple's lawyers may or may not do now, Steve Jobs's "thermonuclear war" on Android will always be remembered as an abject failure. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Matthew D. Green
On the matter of encryption, CALEA is even more explicit: A telecommunications carrier shall not be responsible for decrypting, or ensuring the government’s ability to decrypt, any communication encrypted by a subscriber or customer, unless the encryption was provided by the carrier and the carrier possesses the information necessary to decrypt the communication. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 5:27 am
After a jury returned a verdict against Apple, Apple filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:03 am by Mark Summerfield
  As matters stand right now, it does not seem likely that any judgments will be handed down on substantive issues, such as whether Samsung or Apple infringe any of each other’s patents, or whether those patents are valid, until at least the first half of 2014. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:26 am by Florian Mueller
A hearing transcript contains statements by Apple's counsel on how Samsung allegedly leveraged some confidential information during the decisive phase of the ITC investigation and withheld information on the breach from Apple until right after the final ITC ruling.In my first post on this matter -- shortly after the government shutdown began -- I already mentioned that "certain headlines on an ITC docket recently indicated" that Samsung is facing sanctions there as well. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:20 pm by Patent Docs
Apple had moved to dismiss all claims of the '091 patent as directed to ineligible subject matter. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:33 am by Jacqui Cheng
Right off the bat, Apple's response calls the DoJ's complaint "fundamentally flawed as a matter of fact and law. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 8:20 am by Florian Mueller
I even said in a recent post that Apple should stipulate beforehand to such a stay.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:42 am by Mark Summerfield
Samsung patent hearing begins; Samsung sacrificed Qualcomm truce for Apple war; Apple: our 3G isn't Samsung's 3G; and Samsung accuses Apple of ‘ambush litigation’. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:18 am by Unknown
In separate no-action letters, the SEC staff concluded that the proposals transcend ordinary business matters (Apple Inc. and The Walt Disney Company, January 3, 2024).Denied. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 1:19 pm by Florian Mueller
At the end of the day it doesn't even matter whether or not the ITC grants Samsung's motion to strike. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:30 am by Zoe Tillman
Washington's Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox scored a victory late last week in its bid to stay out of a deposition chair over its representation of Apple Inc. in patent matters. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In the Apple/Samsung matter, Judge Koh basically denied Apple's motion to present evidence it practices the patents at issue. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:24 am by Blair Reeves
The level of danger it poses is, of course, a matter of opinion. [read post]
The mere fact that multiple matters are included in a single charter amendment, or that the matters are all broadly “shareholder-friendly,” is not, based on the Apple decision, sufficient to avoid a violation of the unbundling rules. [read post]
As Apple put the matter in its famous letter to customers on the San Bernardino case: In today’s digital world, the “key” to an encrypted system is a piece of information that unlocks the data, and it is only as secure as the protections around it. [read post]