Search for: "Matter of Bailey v Smith"
Results 21 - 40
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Smith (In re Smith), 207 B.R. 26, 30 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm
This case will pit 1995's SOC holding in Bailey v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 2:17 pm
In today’s case (Smith v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Timmerman-Cooper Southern District of Ohio at ColumbusJULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Smith v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Bailey, 398 S.W.2d 946 (Tex. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Schering Health Care Ltd., [2002] EWHC 1420, at ¶ 21 (QB), (2002) 70 BMLR 88 Smith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
563 A.2d at 126-27.Numerous other courts throughout the country have held, similarly to Smith v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:39 pm
” Bailey v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:41 am
This matter has a complicated procedural history, resulting in four Court of Appeals opinions. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
We reverse and remand. * * * BAILEY, J., concurs. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:05 pm
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Kan. 2002) (acknowledging that most courts require a showing of RR > 2, but questioning their reasoning), aff’d, 356 F. 3d 1326 (10th Cir. 2004) Smith v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
The full hearing will be on 4 and 5 July 2019 at the Old Bailey. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:51 pm
Smith v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:13 am
See Smith v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:35 pm
Lonnie Bailey v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:54 pm
Mulvaney, Nana Quay-Smith, Indianapolis, IN. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Bailey, No. 06-5576 Defendant's conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses are affirmed over claims that: 1) a prior Kentucky state court conviction for second-degree escape did not qualify for a career offender enhancement; 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions; and 3) the district court erred in enhancing his Guidelines offense level after finding that he had perjured himself at trial. [read post]
