Search for: "Matter of Colby v Colby"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2013, 8:52 am
By Andrew DelaneyState Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 7:41 am
" [abstract] [full paper] Hila Keren, Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, "Law in the Cultivation of Hope" [abstract] [full paper] Elizabeth V. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
(Props to Tom Colby and Peter Smith for a longer discussion of this inconsistency in their academic work.) [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:02 am
Knopf, Inc. v Colby, 509 F2d 1362, 1370 [4th Cir]). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Specific to the COVID-19 vaccine, children under age 18 in most jurisdictions will require parental consent.[8] While the Supreme Court has noted that “[c]onstitutional rights do not mature and come into being magically only when one attains the state-defined age of majority; [m]inors as well as adults are protected by the Constitution and possess constitutional rights,”[9] in practice, the protections afforded by the Constitution are much more limited as a matter of principle… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:12 pm
Colby made a deal to testify against Evan. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 5:05 am
In Lucia v SEC, the D.C. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 7:46 pm
Knopf, Inc. v Colby, 509 F2d 1362, 1370 [4th Cir]). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:34 pm
Colby, 722 F. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
E.g., Matthews v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation (Amy Gutmann ed., 2018). [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
Lemen (Cal. 2007); Hill v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:30 am
A little while ago, I gave a presentation to the National Judicial Institute‘s annual family law conference on the more important innovations in family justice introduced in British Columbia over the past decade, and in preparing my paper I realized something that struck me as terribly important. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
My name is Tom Galligan and since 2006 it has been my good fortune to serve as the President of Colby-Sawyer College in New London, New Hampshire where I am also a Professor in the Humanities Department. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am
In general, Americans did not seem to mind people coming armed to attend or participate in legislative matters. [read post]
