Search for: "Matter of Dennison" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Bob Bauer
Then there is the matter of legal advice that the president declines to follow. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:10 pm by Mark Weidemaier
In exchange for a payment of $130,000, “Peterson” agrees among other things not to disclose confidential information about Dennison, their “alleged sexual conduct,” and other matters. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:16 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Avery Dennison Corp., 673 F.3d 1372, 1378 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
Of Debtor's liabilities, $750,000.00 is a divorce judgment, $449,594.00 relates to tax liabilities, $384,000.00 is a secured loan with First National Bank of Dennison . . . [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:36 am by Simon Fodden
The Dennisons, they did that. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:38 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
In addition to Rule 52(a), the Court also stated that clear error review was supported by precedent (citing a 1950 Learned Hand opinion on claim construction and the Supreme Court's 1986 Dennison opinion on obviousness) and by "practical considerations": Patent law "depends on familiarity with specific scientific problems and principles," and district judges have "a comparatively greater opportunity to gain that familiarity. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sumpton, 189 F.3d 868, 879 (9th Cir. 1999) (marks used for decades and parent company had annual sales of $3 billion and annual advertising costs of over $5 million; no fame).No matter. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Dennison Manufacturing Co., wherein this court explained that prior art “must be considered in its entirety, i.e., as a whole, including portions that would lead away from the invention in suit. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
“If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in … matters of opinion …. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:23 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
Specifically, because Plaintiff's fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims require the plaintiff to prove that its invention would have received patent protection absent the defendants' allegedly unlawful conduct, our case law compels that we exercise subject matter jurisdiction over it. [read post]
10 May 2012, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
McFarland, the defendant, a resident of Erie County, was charged with importuning and disseminating matter harmful to juveniles for attempting to hook up with someone he thought was a minor in Lucas County. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:31 pm by Paul D. Swanson
Avery Dennison decision issued on April 17, because “our case law compels that we exercise subject matter jurisdiction over it. [read post]