Search for: "Matter of Doe v Taylor" Results 21 - 40 of 925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2019, 12:04 am by David Smith
In Taylor v Mina An Ltd [2019] UKUT 249 (LC) the Upper Tribunal has overturned a refusal of a Rent Repayment Order by the First Tier Tribunal. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:04 am
Alleged violations of a "Memorandum of Understanding" to a Taylor Law agreement may not be subject to contract grievance proceduresPine Plains CSD v Federation of Teachers, 248 A.D.2d 612It is not unusual for parties to a collective bargaining agreement to agree to provisions set out in a “supplemental agreement” or to sign a “memorandum of understanding” in the course of collective bargaining pursuant to the Taylor Law.Typically this… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Furthermore, in paragraph 182 of its judgment in Prosecutor v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Collective bargaining under the Taylor Law: submitting demands characterized as new or regressive after post-impasse fact-findingBuffalo Teachers Federation v Buffalo City School District, PERB U-34445Buffalo City School District v Buffalo Teachers Federation, PERB U-34462 On July 21, 2015, The Buffalo Teachers Federation [BTF] filed an improper practice charge with the New York Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:35 pm
If Local Counsel did not perform their fiduciary duty, it does not matter that they assumed the duty because the fiduciary duty of co-counsel is a joint obligation. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Court of Appeal to determine whether the Taylor Law trumps Second Class Cities Law with respect to negotiating police disciplinary proceduresAppeal of Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 9:59 am
  How you get there does matter, and it should matter, even if she got to the right place. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:27 am by Gene Killian
Let’s review an Illinois case from a few years back, United Stationers Supply Co v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:51 am by Public Employment Law Press
As  to conducting disciplinary hearings in absentia, in Mujtaba v NYS Dept. of Education, 148 A.D.2d 819, the Appellate Division held “due process does not require that [the charged individual] be present at an administrative hearing, but rather requires notice of the charges and an opportunity to be heard. [read post]