Search for: "Matter of Donnell W."
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2016, 6:33 am
Jon W. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
No: Justices Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
(“[W]e employ a two-step test to determine whether a record is exempt as a confidential law enforcement record under R.C. 149.43: ‘First, is the record a confidential law enforcement record? [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
It held that the Elder Abuse Act does not require the existence of a custodial relationship in order for the plaintiff to establish a cause of action for neglect.[2] The court also rejected defendants’ contention that the trial court should determine, as a matter of law, whether defendants’ conduct constituted professional negligence rather than neglect. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:44 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Terry W. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
Justice O’Donnell dissented without opinion, and would dismiss the case as improvidently allowed. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 7:43 am
Norfolk & W. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 2:36 pm
Thoughts on Workers’ Comp and the ADA – Baltimore attorney Fiona W. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
[iii] Pursuant to the lead opinion authored by Justice Lanzinger, “[w]hen contracts pass to the surviving company following merger, the surviving company obtains the same bargain agreed to by the preceding company, nothing more. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Under Rule 54 of the regulations that govern procedure, closed proceedings and the exclusion of a party and their legal representative can be used in Crown employment matters if it is ‘expedient in the interests of national security’. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
Bealefeld III; Chief James W. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 2:18 pm
Defendant issued W-2 forms to plaintiffs, withheld taxes, and offered health plan benefits that included paying 70 percent of the cost. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 10:54 am
Senate candidate] Christine O'Donnell or Levi Johnston. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:59 am
W. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:09 am
O’Donnell, 301 N.J. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
EPA's air quality standards for soot in order to safeguard public health and the environment, according to a draft report from agency scientists.Current evidence "calls into question whether the current suite" of health-based standards for fine particulate matter, or soot, "protects public health with an adequate margin of safety from effects associated with long- and short-term exposures," says the draft report issued this month.EPA last revised its soot standard… [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 4:23 am
You can create a new email in a matter of seconds, and then be on your way! [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(W. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:23 am
& Prac. 4 Art. 4 *** John W. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 6:53 am
As a general matter, I think I share Patrick O'Donnell's reaction to Alice's provocation: "Alas, we've plenty of daily reminders of what 'stinkers' we are or at least can be, [and] perhaps it's time we establish norms and models that are worthy of imitation and emulation, that set a more elevated tone or encourage a more virtuous ethos. [read post]
