Search for: "Matter of Electronic Surveillance"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2013, 2:54 pm
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), along with Access and Privacy International, took a leadership role in developing the campaign. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
But only recently have congressional committees leveraged their subpoena authority to collect electronic evidence in ways that implicate the surveillance power of the digital world. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 8:22 am
“Working on the Atlas of Surveillance project with the Electronic Frontier Foundation has been one of the most rewarding and profound experiences that I have ever had. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:20 pm
Or anything else, for that matter. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 10:39 am
As an initial matter, the answer is yes. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
In the Western District of Washington, government applications for electronic surveillance warrants or orders are designated as Magistrate Judge (MJ) matters. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:56 pm
However, on the matter of government surveillance, 65% of respondents believe there are not adequate limits on data collection. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:08 pm
No matter who controls surveillance equipment, police will ask to use it. [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:57 pm
France is just stripping the matter bare. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 3:52 pm
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 requires the attorney general to submit an annual report to Congress detailing the number of applications and orders processed for such surveillance. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Cell phone tracking expert witnesses may provide reports regarding electronic surveillance, internet and computer surveillance, cell phone tracking and associated matters. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:12 am
On October 31, 2022, Jennifer Abruzzo, the NLRB’s General Counsel (GC), released a memorandum regarding employer use of electronic surveillance and automated management, and its potential interference with employees’ ability to confidentially engage in protected activity under Section 7 of the Act. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:56 am
If the matter ever came to before the courts one issue examined would be the nature of any “exacting review” undertaken by MPs into the necessity of extending these powers. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:56 pm
Since the 2005 disclosure of surveillance programs by the New York Times, there have been numerous hearings, conferences, papers, articles, and public discussions debating the matter, both partisan and otherwise. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
On June 24, 2021, in Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle v Baltimore Police Department,[1] the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit On Rehearing En Blanc decided that Baltimore’s use of an aerial surveillance pilot program violated the Fourth Amendment.[2] The court remanded the matter for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:02 pm
Finally, there remains the matter of the independent oversight body making sure the Privacy Shield operates as it should. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 10:46 am
“This new surveillance of Black Lives Matter protesters is exactly the kind of harm that the San Francisco supervisors were trying to prevent when they passed a critical surveillance technology ordinance last year. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 11:20 am
"... but has concluded that the conduct did not affect the overall validity of the surveillance application, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
It then searches that cloned data, keeping all of the emails containing certain keywords and deleting the rest – all in a matter of seconds. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:47 am
Glenn Greenwald has an interesting reaction to the legislative death of the grandiosely-named USA Freedom Act: It doesn’t matter. [read post]
