Search for: "Matter of Jonathan R. v Michael R." Results 21 - 40 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2021, 2:07 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
As a threshold matter, Judge Friedland noted that Justice Kennedy's concurring opinion in Rapanos v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Opinion No. 20190748-CA Filed December 24, 2020 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable Michael Edwards No. 134701192 Jonathan Hibshman, Marco Brown, and Rodney R. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Partlett (Emory), Jonathan Peters (Georgia), Michael Perry (Emory), Glenn Harlan Reynolds (Tennessee), Ani B. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
Foreign Direct Investment, the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, and Individual Corruption Experiences in Africa Christopher Heurlin, Authoritarian Aid and Regime Durability: Soviet Aid to the Developing World and Donor–Recipient Institutional Complementarity and Capacity Simone Dietrich, Helen V Milner, & Jonathan B Slapin, From Text to Political Positions on Foreign Aid: Analysis of Aid Mentions in Party Manifestos from 1960 to 2015 Laura Seelkopf & Ida Bastiaens,… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
(Update: No)–5/5/20 The Penalty-less Individual Mandate Is Severable from the Rest of the ACA No Matter How You Look at It. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
During her confirmation hearings, Senate Democrats suggested Justice Barrett should recuse from election litigation, and former judge Michael Luttig wrote an op-ed arguing Justice Barrett may be obligated to recuse under the Supreme Court's decision in Caperton v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
During her confirmation hearings, Senate Democrats suggested Justice Barrett should recuse from election litigation, and former judge Michael Luttig wrote an op-ed arguing Justice Barrett may be obligated to recuse under the Supreme Court's decision in Caperton v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
A second academic amicus brief by Samuel Bray, Michael McConnell and Kevin Walsh arguing the courts lack statutory subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the case. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 11:45 am by Paul Cassell
  For more background on the case, see my post here and Jonathan's post here. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 pm by Ilya Somin
Cornell Law Professor Michael Dorf and co-blogger Jonathan Adler argue that this was a serious error, making it likely that the five conservative justices will rule against the House. [read post]