Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 21 - 40
of 878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 4:21 pm
Kerr. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
Why did all this matter in this case? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
In the matter of Peacock, heard 14 December 2011. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 11:32 am
(Orin Kerr) The more I participate in discussions on the constitutionality of the indivdiual mandate, the more it feels to me like a replay of last year’s discussions on the Privileges or Immunities Clause on the road to McDonald v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:06 pm
The long-awaited judgment in Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers Limited is the right decision. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 3:06 am
I did some quick research into the matter. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Starting on Monday 20 February 2012 is a one day hearing for In the Matter of S (a Child, in front of a panel of five (L Phillips, L Hale, L Mance, L Kerr, L Wilson). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:35 am
For such reasons, the fact section of Judge Walker’s opinion is likely to matter a lot less than it would normally matter in appellate litigation. [read post]
10 May 2015, 9:30 am
On this reading (Kerr pointed out to me) the 2nd Circuit echoes Justice Alito’s concurrence in Riley v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:42 pm
(Orin Kerr) Judge Walker’s opinion in the same-sex marriage case is notable for its factual record. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm
(Orin Kerr) Over at the Federalist Society’s new blog, SCOTUSreport.com, Steven Teles has a very interesting post on the Chief Justice’s opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm
Some might think that, given that we had unanimity in Kinloch (AP) (Appellant) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 62, the diversity of opinions in the JR38 judgement is a bit surprising. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 6:30 am
Writing at The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has this terrific post about the Baze lethal injection case to be argued in the Supreme Court next week. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 6:42 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve had a few posts recently on new Fourth Amendment decisions that I think are wrongly decided, and I wanted to flag an update on one case that I blogged about back in March: Rehberg v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
And I’m not very interested in a discussion of Fox v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm
(Orin Kerr) No, claims the plaintiff in Wong v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 7:16 pm
(Orin Kerr) A.J. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:23 pm
Source: Justice Kennedy, concurring in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:21 pm
Bush v. [read post]
