Search for: "Matter of McCoy v McCoy"
Results 21 - 40
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2021, 8:43 am
Bringing to mind the infamous Hatfield-McCoy family feud, Concho Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:08 am
Designs, Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:42 am
” Only a few months later, the court did it again in McCoy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
“This doctrine applies where there is continuing trust and confidence in the relationship between the parties and the attorney’s continuing representation pertains to the specific matter in which the attorney committed the [*3]alleged malpractice, not merely the continuity of a general professional relationship” (Deep v Boies, 53 AD3d 948, 950 [2008] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at… [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am
“To succeed on a motion to dismiss based upon documentary evidence pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the documentary evidence must utterly refute the plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law” (Gould v Decolator, 121 AD3d 845, 847; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88). [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm
Habeas statute of limitations was not extended by McCoy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Rather than file a response to Giustra’s claim, Twitter sought to have the matter dismissed out of B.C. courts, arguing that California, where Twitter has its headquarters, would be the correct jurisdiction but its arguments were rejected. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Pakdel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:00 am
McCoy, 156 A.2d 307 (Pa. 1959). [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 6:17 am
Harbison or McCoy v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, the plaintiff must allege that “the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession,” and that the “breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295,… [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
The Court stated, “Feuds can metastasize into the Hatfields and McCoys or the Montagues and Capulets. [read post]
26 May 2020, 4:30 am
In order to be entitled to summary judgment, the movant “must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact from the case” (Winegrad v New York Univ. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:00 am
The Court stated, “Feuds can metastasize into the Hatfields and McCoys or the Montagues and Capulets. [read post]
