Search for: "Matter of Nimmer"
Results 21 - 40
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2014, 10:35 am
That is why both sides will be anxiously watching the oral arguments for hints as to where the various justices stand on the matter. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:12 pm
As explained in Nimmer on Copyright, “if, regardless of medium, defendant’s work performs a different function from plaintiff’s, then notwithstanding its use of substantially similar material, the defense of fair use may prevail. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 9:01 pm
Nimmer became the dominant treatise merely because it was the only one for decades. [read post]
29 May 2016, 2:43 pm
In Dream Games the Court stated: As Professor Nimmer has written, the defense of illegality or unclean hands is “recognized only rarely, when the plaintiff’s transgression is of serious proportions and relates directly to the subject matter of the infringement action The Mitchell/Belcher principle leads to the conclusion that illegal operation of a copyrightable work neither deprives the work of copyright protection nor precludes generally available remedies. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:12 am
David Nimmer is Professor from Practice, UCLA School of Law; Of Counsel, Irell & Manella LLP. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:40 pm
Asay Juries and the Development of Fair Use Standards – David Nimmer Platforms and Interoperability in Oracle v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Nimmer & David Nimmer, 4 Nimmer on Copyright § 13.05(A)(4) (Matthew Bender rev. ed. 2021). [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Ofseyer says: England, like many other countries, had long enforced orthodoxy in matters of opinion. [read post]
17 May 2007, 7:55 am
The only article on the matter Davida H. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 7:07 am
Menell and David Nimmer in a separate submission also highlight inconsistency with SCOTUS’s seminal decision in Baker v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 9:55 pm
Under modern caselaw, however, the boundary of patentable subject matter may not include a game per se. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
In the Quartz, writer Adam Pasick says, “It’s pretty well established by now that unauthorized sampling—the act of copying an actual recorded sound, no matter how brief—is a no-no. [read post]
3 May 2008, 5:08 am
"--David Nimmer, co-author of Nimmer on Copyright [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:55 am
First, does a tattoo constitute copyrightable subject matter? [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 9:27 am
Ct. 213 (1987); 1 Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[B] at 2-16. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am
Nimmer: photog. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:39 pm
Nimmer, Copyright §13.01[A] (2010) (Nimmer). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:43 am
Turning to more mundane matters, the title and subtitle of this tome are somewhat at odds. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:03 am
Fortunately, in none of these cases did the reference to “enterprise liability” actually matter. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
”11 A few district courts have disagreed with Nimmer and found that the right “to authorize” stands alone. [read post]
