Search for: "Matter of Review of State Bar Dues Increase"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
In addition to limiting arms transfers to certain states, the last two Congresses have considered a slew of other reforms that would increase oversight of and place new limits upon arms sales. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
The state of scholarship and “intellectual due process” makes it impossible to tell whether or not Dr. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 1:17 am
Human review by the Bar removed nearly all flags, leaving only 47 examinees with sanctions. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
What started as a "blog carnival" for everyone interested in law has grown into a community that comes together every week to review recent legal news, opinions, and commentary from an increasing number of remarkable law blogs. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
What started as a "blog carnival" for everyone interested in law has grown into a community that comes together every week to review recent legal news, opinions, and commentary from an increasing number of remarkable law blogs. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:49 am
Regardless, comments received by DWC from both the defense bar and the claimant bar are aligned in seeking some increase in the hourly rate. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
The post Week in Review first appeared on The Regulatory Review. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:59 pm
L ok New $2.15M OCR Penalty Shows Health Plans Risks Of HIPAA Violations Proposed NLRB Employee Definition To Exclude College Study Workers DOL Proposing To Allow Default Website ERISA Retirement Plan Disclosures Salary Threshold Increases Require Employer Review Of Salaried Worker FLSA Exemption Qualification Chrisley and Other Criminal Tax Prosecut If you or someone else you know would like to receive future updates about developments on these and… [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 10:23 am
A review of those terms, by means of the scroll bar, would have revealed the term requiring users to transfer an exclusive license to Xcentric. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am
Rodriguez and foreshadows increased difficulty for detained asylum-seekers hoping to challenge their prolonged imprisonment without bond hearings. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:51 am
However, the utilities had argued that the PSC had exceeded its statutory authority in ordering the utilities to enter into a contract with a third party, on the language of section 7-509(a) which states that the PSC, except for two situations not applicable to the case at bar, may not regulate “the generation, supply, and sale of electricity” as an electronic company service or function. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 1:27 am
Welcome to Blawg Review #187. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
It was a family law matter. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
In that case, the Superior Court reviewed the history of the error in judgment rule and held that it was no longer valid in Pennsylvania due to its inconsistency with the "standard of care" analysis utilized in medical malpractice cases. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:27 am
Defendants argued that § 518 was an anti-fraud law barring “surcharges” that were increases over the “regular price,” and that the “regular price” was the price communicated to consumers. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
How should regulators balance automation and human review in social security matters? [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
This essay was originally published in Administrative & Regulatory Law News, the quarterly magazine of the American Bar Association’s Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Section. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:16 pm
Plaintiff sued her husband’s employer for negligence, negligence per se (as a matter of law due to violation of the law), premises liability, and public nuisance. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 2:28 pm
While a WSA is required for certain discretionary development approvals, the Court had already held in the final judgment in the related action that the challenged approval was a ministerial minor modification requiring no further CEQA review, and plaintiffs were “barred from relitigating that finding. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:09 pm
On 11 October 2019 the Defendant made its decision which is the subject matter of this application. [read post]
