Search for: "Matter of Rosenberg v Rosenberg" Results 21 - 40 of 252
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by Lawrence Solum
David Rosenberg College of Law) has posted Trademarks, NFTs, and the Law of the Metaverse on SSRN. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  There was a post on the Privacy Matters blog. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:59 am by Eugene Volokh
I just ran across it for the first time, so I thought I'd pass it along; it's Schoeller v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:32 pm by Georgialee Lang
  The court indicated that the standard of review of an appeal from an arbitrator mirrored the deferential standard required in an appeal from a judge, citing Rosenberg v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
  Gerald Rosenberg bases his controversial claim that lawyers cannot bring about substantial social change on the impact of Brown v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 9:27 am by Robert Chesney
Circuit opinion authored by now-Attorney General Merrick Garland expressly affirmed as much in Khan v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 3:06 pm by Mark Graber
  This, as political scientists and historians are taught in graduate school, is a major controversy with Gerald Rosenberg’s The Hollow Hope laying down a challenge that has never been fully answered to demonstrate powerful political effects from the judicial decision in Brown v. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 7:50 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Sourabh Gupta examined the impact of South China Sea arbitration before the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea tribunal five years after its landmark decision in Philippines v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Rosenberg and Hadar Dancig-Rosenberg, Ono Academic College – Law School and Bar-Ilan University. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 11:15 pm
Recently, the Fourth District addressed this issue as a matter of first impression in Bolger v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Judiciary Law § 487 permits recovery of treble damages in a civil action against an attorney who intentionally deceives the court or a party during the pendency of a judicial proceeding (see Beshara v Little, 215 AD2d 823, 823 [1995]; see generally Amalfitano v Rosenberg, 12 NY3d 8, 14 [2009]). [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Rosenberg: “You’re quite right, the President has that power to pardon. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Rosenberg & Estis, 192 AD2d 451 [1st Dept 1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 654 [1993]). [read post]