Search for: "Matter of State of New York v Gen C." Results 21 - 40 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
In both cases, they were adjustments to a new regime which, overall, had shifted away from worldwide taxation. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm by Ritika Singh
The New York Times editorial board says that the close vote is a sign of discord to come. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The First Department declined to follow the interpretation of the Second Department which held that the ICPC applies to a nonrespondent parent living outside of New York (Matter of Alexus M. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:42 pm
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run on January 28, 2007. Categories Included: Corrections, Criminal Procedure, Judiciary, Penal, and Retirement Incentive. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS) January 21, 2007. Sorted by category: Bill No.  A2190 Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Zimmmer, Inc., 927 F.2d 124, 129 (2d Cir. 1991) (applying New York law); Phelps v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:37 am
Criminal Sanction Impact. 02/20/07 referred to codes LAW / CRIM-PROCA5587 Seminerio -- Requires the district attorney to notify all victims of case disposition SUMM : Amd S440.50, CP L Requires the district attorney to inform a victim by letter of the final disposition of a case against a defendant, in order to give such victim the opportunity to exercise his right to give a victim impact statement. 02/20/07 referred to codes LAW / CRIM-PROCA5588 Morelle (MS) -- Authorizes… [read post]