Search for: "Matter of State of New York v Kenneth W." Results 21 - 40 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
CHRISTOPHER SUGRUE, et al.,07 MDL 1902 (JSR)Applies To:08 Civ. 3065, 08 Civ. 3086; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:00 am by Jennifer Williams
Waltz, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed, New York and London: W. [read post]
And this is does not include the thousands of pages of legal memoranda and related correspondence that Kavanaugh wrote while working for Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr and, later, in the George W. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
The Court stated that the instant case was clearly distinguishable from other cases in which the Court has upheld non-consensual searches under Article I, Section 4.United States Constitution: The Court stated that the search clearly fell within the purview of New York v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
The Court stated that the instant case was clearly distinguishable from other cases in which the Court has upheld non-consensual searches under Article I, Section 4.United States Constitution: The Court stated that the search clearly fell within the purview of New York v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
Paradoxically, perhaps, the project of legalization evidences how a love of ancient custom, in this case the customs and patterns of the post-Westphalian law-state, remains, while power shifts to those, enterprises included, that have brought about a revolution in the state and in the meaning of legalization in a new world order that has yet to be revealed. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:01 am by Peter Swire
” With Kenneth Propp, and in Senate testimony, I have sought to define rigorous new mechanisms for individual redress that would indeed meet the Schrems II requirements. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
New York law acknowledges that there is no meaningful distinction between negligent and strict liability failure to warn claims. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/IMDynN (PLG, University of Waterloo) New Order Update: Peck, Parties and Predictive Coding (1313 Pages Consolidated w/Index) bit.ly/xAztDv (@ComplexD) Reporting Numbers? [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that “[w]hile serving on the U.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:30 am
1976 Copyright Law Meets 21st Century in Case Before 11th Circuit Fulton County Daily Report Kenneth W. [read post]