Search for: "Matter of Taylor v City of New York" Results 21 - 40 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
’" Citing Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y., Inc., 14 NY3d 46, the Appellate Division held that "the presumption is that all terms and conditions of employment are subject to mandatory bargaining. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
”Citing Public Sector Labor and Employment Law [Lefkowitz, Osterman & Townley, published by the New York State Bar Association,], the Court of Appeals observed that “... bargaining is mandatory even for a subject treated by statute unless the statute clearly preempt[s] the entire subject matter or the demand to bargain diminish[es] or merely restate[s] the statutory benefits. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:30 pm
  His attorney told the New York Law Journal that Taylor will seek permission to appeal. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Court of Appeals sustained PERB’s ruling, explaining “that the New York City Charter and Administrative Code, as interpreted in Matter of City of New York v MacDonald (201 AD2d 258, 259 [1st Dept 1994]), required that the discipline of New York City police officers be left to the discretion of the Police Commissioner. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
Demand for premium pay where union cannot negotiate a disciplinary procedure a mandatory subject of collective bargainingMatter of City of New York v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, 2008 NY Slip Op 52693(U), Decided on January 18, 2008, Supreme Court, Albany County, Judge Henry F. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:16 pm
Employee dismissed without a hearing after violating the terms of her disciplinary probation agreementMatter of Bradford v New York City Dept. of Correction, 2008 NY Slip Op 08530, decided on November 13, 2008, Appellate Division, First DepartmentStephanie Bradford was dismissed from her position with the New York City Department of Corrections without a hearing on the grounds that she had violated the terms of a disciplinary… [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
**As to Officer's allegation that hearsay evidence had been considered by the ADC in his arriving at his determination, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Rosa v New York City Hous. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
**As to Officer's allegation that hearsay evidence had been considered by the ADC in his arriving at his determination, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Rosa v New York City Hous. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
Contract provisions agreed upon in the course of collective negotiations pursuant to the Taylor Law cannot not override a statutory mandateMatter of City of Long Beach v Civil Serv. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Board of Collective Bargaining decided that this policy was not subject to collective bargaining under the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14].The Appellate Division upheld the Board’s determination, explaining that [1] “the City Charter provides that the discipline of these EMS employees is the sole province of the New York City Fire Commissioner” and [2] “the Fire… [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An arbitrator's award may only be vacated by a court if it violates public policy, is irrational or it exceeds specified limitations on the arbitrator's powerSubway Surface Supervisors Assn. v New York City Tr. [read post]