Search for: "Matter of Williams v Johnson" Results 21 - 40 of 490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am by Jeffrey Sonnenfeld
  The authors are two highly conservative, leading legal scholars, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has summarised the evidence given by Scobie and Johnson. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Johnson J reached the same decision as Heather Williams J ([2023] EWHC 232 (KB) [pdf]). [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
On the same days, Heather Williams J heard the libel trial in the case of Mehmood v Up and Coming TV Limited. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Richard Hunt
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2023, judgment was handed down in Bukhari v Bukhari [2023] EWHC 427 (KB) by Steyn J. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
“And this is my personal cell phone, Brian,” Perry said during his first exclusive interview on the matter with Fox News. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Many start with and later add investors to ongoing funds and matters. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Piepenbrock v London School of Economics and Political Science & Ors [2023] EWHC 52 (KB) by Heather Williams J. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
IPSO 11191-21 Sharif v The Jewish Chronicle, 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 11103-22 A woman v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10895-22 Various v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 10780-22 Raeburn v southwalesguardian, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication… [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
After all, the first secessionists met in Hartford in 1814, and William Lloyd Garrison famously endorsed “no Union with slaveholders. [read post]