Search for: "Matter v. Washington Department of Corrections et al" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
Collins called for an investigation into conflicts of interest at the DOJ on its handling of the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, and was he ever correct. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Bancorp, et al., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am by Marty Lederman
 Moreover, the Judge and Professor are also correct that the Heckler v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In this case, the correct timing for litigation purposes would have been immediately following discovery of the loan. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of United Retired Firefighters Association and The American Legion Department of CaliforniaAmicus brief of Foundation for Moral LawAmicus brief of American Center for Law and Justice et al.Amicus brief of Texas et al.Amicus brief of David EpsteinAmicus brief of Family Research Council et al.Amicus brief of Rear Admiral Jeremiah Denton, USN (Ret.) et al.Motion of Pacific Justice Institute to withdraw… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:10 am by Lyle Denniston
Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington County, et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The district court dismissed and the First Circuit affirmed, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
Washington (2004).Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Maples v. [read post]