Search for: "Matthews v. C. I. R" Results 21 - 40 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A blaze of recent publicity, and a great deal of legal maneuvering, has turned on the issue of the conservatorship of Britney Spears. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 12 and Tuesday 13 July, the Supreme Court will hear R (on the application of Elan-Cane)  v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
§ 230(c)(2)(A) and the Dormant Commerce Clause.[11]) And then I'll turn in Part III to discussing what Congress may do by offering 47 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Third, R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider whether holiday pay should be calculated on (i) the correct construction of the relevant, nationwide NHS employment contract; and (ii) in relation to the Working Time Directive. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Manchester Building Society (Appellant) v Grant Thornton UK LLP (Respondent), heard 13-14 October 2020 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
I do recall a former partner, who with great exuberance, called every potential expert witness and then felt hurt when some of them showed up as trial witnesses on the other side. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 19 January the Supreme Court will hear the case of Matthew and Ors v Sedman and Ors. [read post]