Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Or is the corporation merely property, a complex commodity? [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Isabelle Huppert as a judge who takes on corporate fraud. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Isabelle Huppert as a judge who takes on corporate fraud. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:16 am
The court held that the McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting framework does not apply to First Amendment retaliation claims, which are governed by a more plaintiff-friendly standard. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 8:55 am
” She also established the John McDonnell Scholarship in the School of Engineering & Applied Science in honor of her father, the retired chairman of the board of McDonnell Douglas Corporation and a life trustee of Washington University. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 7:29 am
While the Port Authority placed much weight on Title VII, the ADA, and ADEA, which all have been interpreted under the McDonnell Douglas framework to require an initial showing that the plaintiff is objectively qualified for the position sought, the court found pointed out the Transportation Management has been consistently applied to analyze USERRA claims. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 10:13 am
In Young, the Court held that an individual pregnant worker who seeks to show disparate treatment under Title VII through indirect evidence may do so through application of the McDonnell Douglas framework, but such plaintiffs are not required to show that the employer’s policy rationale was intentionally biased; rather, the employee can satisfy her burden of showing pretext by demonstrating that the policy put a “significant burden” on pregnant employees, and that… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 1:41 pm
Supreme Court established the basic elements of each type of claim, respectively, in McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:31 am
Furthermore, Judge Ludington argued, “deploying this sort-of disparate impact analysis into the calculus of the McDonnell-Douglas prima facie case evidentiary framework has no express limitation. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:17 am
However, as to but-for causation in McDonnell Douglas “pretext” cases, the Court was silent. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:26 am
Since Davis provided no direct evidence of discrimination, the court analyzed her claim using the McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting framework, where the plaintiff must make a prima facie case that gives rise to an inference of intentional discrimination. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:26 am
Since Davis provided no direct evidence of discrimination, the court analyzed her claim using the McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting framework, where the plaintiff must make a prima facie case that gives rise to an inference of intentional discrimination. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:49 am
” The employee fared no better under the McDonnell Douglas framework. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:45 am
Moreover, because she presented direct evidence of sexual harassment, the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting analysis did not apply and the employer’s argument that it fired her for legitimate reasons — insubordination and complaints about her work — did not change the outcome. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:51 am
It occurred to me recently that it's been a few years since the Court of Appeals in a published opinion reversed summary judgment in a straight McDonnell-Douglas case, which allows the plaintiff to win on the strength of circumstantial evidence. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:18 pm
For straight McDonnell-Douglas discrimination claims we live in a pretext-plus world in the Second Circuit, but the majority reiterates that "A plaintiff may prove that retaliation was a but-for cause of an adverse employment action by demonstrating weaknesses, implausibilities, inconsistencies, or contradictions in the employer’s proffered legitimate, non retaliatory reasons for its action. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
[ix] This idea would later become the Space Shuttle, but it would only take shape after NASA solicited designs from aerospace companies like Lockheed, McDonnell Douglas, General Dynamics, and North American Rockwell. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:06 am
The court’s summary judgment determination was erroneously based on McDonnell Douglas rather than the pattern-or-practice framework, and thus it could not stand. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:56 pm
., which bought the McDonnell-Douglas manufacturer of the plane, and American-based engine-maker Pratt & Whitney, reports the Associated Press. [read post]
