Search for: "Montgomery v. Sellers" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2015, 8:20 am by Joe Koncelik
Montgomery County Board of Revision, BTA Case No. 95-M-855 (May 2, 1997); McDonald Local School District Board of Education v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
North America, Inc., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the horns and… [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:09 pm
In the absence of any allegations of concerned activity between the hospitals' two DME providers, the only theory that could possibly support the claims was one based on shared monopoly, which was not recognized as a viable cause of action, the court explained.The decision—Precision CPAP, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 9:22 am by Phyllis H. Marcus and Matthew W. Modell
Starbucks, Kraft Foods Tassimo Pod Suit Dismissal Affirmed by Sixth Circuit In Montgomery v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
Introduction In 2007, in response to the public's anger about the high cost of gasoline after the hurricane disasters, the House of Representatives drafted and passed the Federal Price Gouging Prevention Act ("FPGPA"), which reads in part: "It shall be unlawful for any person to sell…during a period of an energy emergency, gasoline…at a price that (A) is unconscionably excessive; and… [read post]