Search for: "Moore v. Hand" Results 21 - 40 of 859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:37 pm by Nicki Milionis
By: Nicki Milionis and Michael McCrae with thanks to Yasmine Sahihi and Amy Moore for their contributions Victoria’s first industrial manslaughter decision pursuant to section 39G of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic) (OHS Act) was handed down in the Supreme Court recently in R v LH Holding Management Pty Ltd & Hanna [2024] VSC 90 (R v LH). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:59 am by Daniel Spiegel
And when one compares Jones with a case that well predates Moore, State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:21 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit handed down a mixed decision in Chewy, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
As troubling as the prospect of mass, summary deportations may be, reactions to Trump’s proposed use of the Alien Enemies Act have in many cases underestimated the risk at hand. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:56 am by LII Team
President and Fellows of Harvard College, Moore v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
"  That quotation is from a column that I wrote this past December commenting on Neil Gorsuch's performance during oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Floyd sent arms southward so that they would be "on hand when treason wanted them. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
At the core is a narrative inversion--for to some extent one might be excused if one sees in this drama a greater one (and one deeply satisfying for some): the collective reconstruction of peoples who suffered great tragedy at the hands of other peoples (only one of whom  was burdened with its responsibility in the case of one of the parties) now by a process of psychological necessary becomes  the very thing responsible for its tragedy. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
These three cases, taken together, are nothing less than a revolution in free exercise clause jurisprudence, tying the hands of the states when it comes to regulating private schools-- all done with no originalist support.In Kennedy v. [read post]