Search for: "NYQUIST v NYQUIST"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
An illustration of such a narrow construction is set out in Board of Education v Nyquist (48 NY2D 97). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Sinai UFSD v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:12 am
Nyquist, 413 U.S. 756, 820 (1973) (White, J., dissenting). [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Nyquist, 41 AD2d 363, affirmed, 34 NY2d 588. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 11:52 am
World Airways v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 61 NY2d 542 and Baer v Nyquist, 34 NY2d 291. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 11:52 am
World Airways v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 61 NY2d 542 and Baer v Nyquist, 34 NY2d 291. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 9:00 am
Donna Cisson, et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 5:20 am
Determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty "under the circumstances"King v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03098, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFigueroa v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03104, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAs the Court of Appeals explained in Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and… [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:52 am
In such situations the courts have upheld the employer summarily suspending the employee without pay as was the case in Meliti v Nyquist, 41 NY2d 183. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 10:33 am
In the case of Minkin v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am
In Locke v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 1:20 pm
VI, cl. 2.; Nyquist, 432 U.S. at 10, 53 L. [read post]