Search for: "Neal v. USA" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
 Professor John Cross (University of Louisville, USA) pointed out that in the US, unlike in India, the problem was not a lack of privilege protection. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:25 am
The facts of the dispute mirrored those of a case decided by the Federal Court of Canada in 2012, Bodum USA v Trudeau Corporation (1889) Inc.From arbitrating designs to litigating copyright, the chosen follow-on workshop entitled “Aereo – copyright lessons for the US and beyond” provided an engaging debate surrounding the US Federal Supreme Court’s decision in ABC v Aereo, handed down in June 2014.John Carson Partner (Knobbe Martens, US) and a… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am by Rob Robinson
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:20 am by James Bickford
  At USA Today, Joan Biskupic has a similar summary, as well as a look at the end-of-term opinion-writing process. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am by Kali Borkoski
Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal has recommended that cert. be denied in eight of those nine cases; he has recommended a grant in just one case, Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:22 am by Kali Borkoski
Joan Biskupic at USA Today has more details. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:59 am by Steve Hall
By choosing Verrilli, the President passed over Neal K. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:41 am by Amanda Rice
The Court also heard argument in Williamson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:13 am by Adam Chandler
NASA contractors have asked Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal to retract a statement made last week during oral argument in NASA v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
” In non-nomination news: The BLT reported yesterday that Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal has notified the Court that some of the information provided to the Justices by a federal official and used in the recent juvenile life-without-parole case Graham v. [read post]