Search for: "Nixon v. United States of America" Results 21 - 40 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2021, 9:30 am by Steve Gottlieb
It wasn’t until Nixon and Reagan started to split the labor movement on the anvil of race that the power of working people in America began to decline. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Indeed, the single article of impeachment, delivered to the Senate after Trump had left office, reads: “Article of impeachment . . . against Donald John Trump, President [not former President] of the United States of America. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am by Anna Salvatore
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am by Joseph Fishkin
In parts of the United States, back alley abortions would then have remained common, and lunch counters segregated.But to Republicans today, defeating Bork was the original sin. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
If we could put the whole American body politic behind such a veil and ask them to create a new mechanism for the selection of a president, would they not be driven to adopt the mode of election that most readers of this symposium likely prefer: a national popular vote, to be conducted in a single constituency (let’s call it the collective United States of America, as opposed to fifty electorally autonomous states and the District of Columbia), with a… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
”Once it was established that adults in the United States had the right to buy and use contraception, the attention shifted to access. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]