Search for: "North v. NAACP"
Results 21 - 40
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, Nance v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
This narrow reading is ultimately too narrow, in that it reads the classic association rights cases, NAACP v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:03 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP The justices will decide whether North Carolina lawmakers may intervene in a lawsuit to defend the state’s voter-ID law because they disagree with the litigation strategy of the state attorney general, who is already representing the state, and what standard would allow lawmakers to intervene in the future. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court suggests why that is a mistake on North Carolina’s part.In Berger v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in in 1960 in Clay v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP: The case involves a legal challenge to North Carolina’s voter-identification law, specifically whether two Republican members of the North Carolina legislature should be able to intervene in the suit. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
McGhee and Hurd v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:41 pm
State Conf. of NAACP v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 2:40 pm
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 11:21 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, the discussion seemingly centered around dry procedural minutiae and one of the banes of legal writing courses—the appropriate standard of review to... [read post]
With Thomas in hospital, eight justices hear N.C. Republicans’ plea to intervene in voter-ID lawsuit
21 Mar 2022, 7:57 pm
In Berger v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:00 am
On Monday, in Berger v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:35 pm
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, both of which involve intervention, but she argues that neither is likely to bear on the timeliness issue here. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 7:18 am
Nabrit, who was also a lead counsel for the NAACP at the time of Bolling v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 2:10 pm
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (March 21): Whether Republican legislators who wanted to intervene to defend the North Carolina’s voter ID law were required to show that the state’s interest was not adequately represented by the state’s Democratic attorney general. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:30 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:04 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 21-248, addressing the ability of North Carolina legislators to intervene to defend the state’s voter-ID law from lawsuits under the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 3:40 pm
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, which presents the following questions: Whether a state agent authorized by state law to defend the State’s interest in litigation must overcome a... [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:13 pm
In Berger v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 10:58 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 21-248. [read post]