Search for: "Novartis, Ltd., Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
USA, Inc., 566 F.3d 989, 994(Fed. [read post]
15 May 2011, 8:55 pm by Patent Docs
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. 1:11-cv-00367; filed April 25, 2011 in the District Court of Delaware • Plaintiffs: Elan Corp. plc; Elan Pharma International Ltd. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 9:17 pm by Patent Docs
• Defendants: IntelliPharmaCeutics Corp.; IntelliPharmaCeutics Ltd.; Par Pharmaceutical Inc. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:30 am
It was decided rather earlier this month, but the ruling of Mr Justice Kitchin in Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 1671 (Pat) has taken a while to reach the top of the IPKat's must-blog pile. 356 paragraphs can take a long time for a Kat to read and, though he hates to admit it, even longer to get the hang of what it's all about.In brief, Novartis claimed that J&J's Acuvue Oasys products infringed… [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:32 am
Lynn Goldsmith and Lynn Goldsmith, Ltd. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 2:03 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Neil Martin Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2007] EWCA Civ 1041 (25 October 2007) Cadogan & Anor v Sportelli & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 1042 (25 October 2007) Boudh v Bodh [2007] EWCA Civ 1019 (25 October 2007) AA (Somalia) v SSHD [2007] EWCA Civ 1040 (25 October 2007) Kohn v Wagschal & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 1022 (24 October 2007) Poole & Ors v HM Treasury [2007] EWCA Civ 1021 (24 October 2007) Wright & Ors, R (on… [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:42 am by Magdaleen Jooste
Fiberweb Geosynthetic Ltd., Geofabrics Ltd. won a patent infringement judgement against Fiberweb Geosynthetic Ltd. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
 His recent cases include Community trade marks, registered design and enforcement issues in Starbucks (HK) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting plc and Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc  (and here). [read post]