Search for: "O'Connor v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2023, 7:05 am by Ilya Somin
Yesterday, federal District Judge Reed O'Connor issued a decision in Braidwood Management, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is always a case-by-case analysis under Supreme Court precedent, including O'Connor v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Miller (Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law) & Harry Hobbs (University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Law) have posted Unraveling the International Law of Colonialism: Lessons from Australia and the United States on SSRN. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:34 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Chief Justice O'Connor and Justices Brunner and Stewart concurred in the judgement only, but none wrote separately to defend deference to agency interpretations. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm by Josh Blackman
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
As Justice OConnor noted, Congress had never expressly granted this power to the FDA. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am by Ilya Somin
 That Justice O'Connor announced a federalism canon in 1991 (or the Court applied similar ones in other cases from that time period) hardly provides support for the originalist bona fides of the canon. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
" … O';Connor-Ratcliff's and Zane's use of their social media pages qualifies as state action under § 1983. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 7:37 pm by Josh Blackman
If so, Justice O';Connor's Equal Protection in Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:58 pm by Josh Blackman
Ultimately, three conservative members of the Court — Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor and Kennedy — voted to stand by that landmark precedent. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
The events of the past month, including, most notably, the Dobbs case reversing Roe, has exposed the hollowness of the hope that what used to be called “reasoned elaboration” would, as somewhat pathetically asserted in the famous plurality opinion in Casey in by Justices OConnor, Kennedy, and Souter, bring the national debate to an end because the Supreme Court, had, after all, issued its ukase. [read post]