Search for: "Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes"
Results 21 - 40
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda: THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020) July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing… [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 2:31 am
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has backed NGO Global Witness in its battle over protecting journalistic sources. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
Labour has an announced its opposition to the repeal of section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013, a rule designed to enable cost-effective mediation to resolve libel claims for news publishers who sign up to the government-backed regulator. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
On the same day Kenneth Parker J will hear applications in the case of Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG and Andrews J will ha [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:02 pm
Driehaus will be Michael A. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
YXB v TNO, heard 26 February 2015, (Warby J). [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
The “data protection” case of Hegglin v Persons Unknown and Google will begin on Monday 24 November 2014 before Jay J. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
The ad coelum maxim, wrote Judge J. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
Welcome back to the human rights roundup. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
On Tuesday 17 March 2015 judgment was entered for the Defendant in the case of McEvoy v Michael. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Mihály J. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm
Rahman v ARY Network Ltd, heard 1, 2 and 6 July 2015 (Haddon-Cave J). [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
FAIR (requiring law schools to allow military recruiters equal access to their campuses as a funding condition), Pruneyard (requiring a private owned shopping mall to allow political petitioning inside its property), and Zauderer (requiring disclosures in lawyer advertising). [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm
On 28 October 2022 Nicklin J handed down judgment in Hayden v Associated Newspapers [2022] EWHC 2693 (KB). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
A public hearing in the Tulisa Contostavlos v Michael Mendahun and others case took place last Monday and the order was continued. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 30 November 2020 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of HJK v Persons Unknown. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
Details were leaked to the press last week with the Mail on Sunday saying that it was “press regulation by the back door”. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’… [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am
J. [read post]
