Search for: "Omnicom Group Inc" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2016, 3:14 am by Nassiri Law
Plaintiff alleges his former employer, Omnicom Group, discriminated against him on the basis of gender. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Omnicom Group, Inc., urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to conclude the discrimination based on sexual orientation is sex discrimination and, therefore, violates Title VII. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Omnicom Group, Inc., urging the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to conclude the discrimination based on sexual orientation is sex discrimination and, therefore, violates Title VII. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:47 am by Stefanie K. Vaudreuil
Omnicom Group, Inc., reached the opposite result, finding that although the conduct alleged in the case was “reprehensible,” discrimination based on sexual orientation does not violate Title VII. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:56 am by Theo Francis
A real non-compete — Under a revised version of its “Senior Executive Restrictive Covenant and Retention Plan Agreement,” advertising and marketing outfit Omnicom Group (OMC) promises annual payments of up to $1.5 million to participating execs in return for promises from them not to compete against, interfere with or disparage Omnicom when they leave. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Chandler III's opinion in Seneca summarizes the dispute as follows:  Seneca Investments, LLC was formed in 2001 by Michael Tierney and Omnicom Group, Inc., a large publicly traded New York corporation. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:35 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBusiness LawClass Certified in Stock Fraud Action; Alleged Failure To Rely, Limitations Statute Defenses Inapplicable In re Omnicom Group Inc. [read post]
8 May 2007, 1:24 am
Securities Class Action Certified Against Omnicom Group New York Law Journal A securities fraud suit against Omnicom Group, a marketing and corporate communications company that pursued a "method of expansion by acquisition" of smaller agencies, can proceed as a class action on behalf of potentially thousands of "persons and entities," a New York federal judge has ruled. [read post]