Search for: "On-Site Screening, Inc. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2021, 7:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Accepting as true Nicklen’s allegations that he licensed the Video to “almost two dozen entities both in the United States and throughout the world,” this factor weighs against fair use. __ Use of content posted to social media has generated many posts on this blog, starting with AFP v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am by Editor Charlie
  Established in 1931, SGA has for 90 years successfully operated with a two-word mission statement: “Protect Songwriters,” and continues to do so throughout the United States and the world. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 6:18 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
EPA’s approval will allow the BiaXam product to be used at facilities owned or controlled by Delta Air Lines, Inc., at specific sites in Georgia, Minnesota, and Utah, on indoor hard, nonpliable, nonporous, and nonfood-contact surfaces in airplanes, airports, and other air-travel related facilities owned or controlled by Delta Air Lines, Inc. including, but not limited to: Airplanes: railings, doorknobs/handles, armrests, seatback touch screens, seatbelt… [read post]
In prior studies, a portion of the project site had been identified as a significant heritage resource, and prior consultants believed that the site met the requirements for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Resources. [read post]
In prior studies, a portion of the project site had been identified as a significant heritage resource, and prior consultants believed that the site met the requirements for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Resources. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 2:41 pm by vforberger
Jennico 2 Inc., UI Hearing No. 06201757EC (10 Nov. 2006) (available at https://lirc.wisconsin.gov/ucdecsns/2691.htm), Kaiver v. [read post]
In prior studies, a portion of the project site had been identified as a significant heritage resource, and prior consultants believed that the site met the requirements for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Resources. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Federal and State Prosecutions against Physicians and Screening Companies After Judge Jack’s exposé of fraudulent and false diagnoses in the silicosis MDL, various news media reported that the United States Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York was investigating possible criminal charges against the physicians and lawyers who orchestrated the screenings. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 12:05 pm by Richard Hunt
VaporDNA, Case 1:20-cv-02294-JGK in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Cruz v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
Instead, rates are dependent upon the size of the advertising network, meaning that a large multinational business advertising on a local news site may face no tax, while a local restaurant purchasing keyword advertising on a prominent search engine would bear the costs of a tax imposed at the 10 percent maximum rate. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:16 pm by Anthony Zaller
  Illustrative of this, the Plaintiffs in the action dismissed all non-California law claims following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]