Search for: "Order Addressing Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment on Counts I and II" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm by Nursing Home Law Center LLC
Anemia – A medical condition in which the red blood cell count (hemoglobin) is less than normal. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:33 pm by WIMS
Finally, we affirm the district court's denial of Auto Owners' motion for summary judgment on preclusion grounds. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Charles Johnson
All are subject to fines of not more than $250,000 (not more than $500,000 for organizations), most may serve as the basis for a restitution order, and some for a forfeiture order. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
P. 26(a)(2)(B)(ii) (1993) (emphasis added). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:53 pm by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the District of Columbia, the court gave a mixed bag ruling on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (here and here) filed by FDA and Stat-Trade, Inc. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm by Bexis
  Even if petitioners are not yet themselves subject to discovery orders, then, they would not be free from the burdens of discovery. . . . [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:26 pm
The August 6 decision addressed defendants’ summary judgment motion as to the Counts I – IV, but did not discuss Count V, because plaintiff voluntarily withdrew that claim in a footnote in her answering brief. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
In effect, he/she says: "I am only stating what I have been told, and I believe it. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 10:35 am
("Bank of America") appeals the trial court's denial of its motion for summary judgment and Order on Trial ("Order") following a bench trial on Bank of America's claims against Bank One, N.A., n/k/a JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Moon, No. 06-5581 "Defendant's conviction and sentence for health care fraud and making false statements regarding health care matters is affirmed over challenges to: 1) a denial of her motion to dismiss one count of her indictment; 2) a denial of her motion to suppress evidence; 3) the reasonableness of her sentence; and 4) evidentiary rulings with respect to 'summary evidence.[' " U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US… [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:52 am
On December 12, 2006, the Bamishes filed a Motion for Summary Judgment arguing primarily that Cornett failed to commence the action within the applicable statute of limitations. [read post]