Search for: "Owen v. Taylor" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
The last phrase of this rule was the part that gave Justice Sam Alito pause in his concurring opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Taylor, 917 F.2d at 1403; United States v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 17 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Owens v Owens. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:28 am by WSLL
Taylor, Student Director, Prosecution Assistance Program, University of Wyoming, College of Law.Date of Decision: February 6, 2012Facts: Appellant, Joseph Randall Owens, entered a conditional guilty plea to felony possession of methamphetamine in violation of Wyo. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:42 am
Following a thoroughly well-deserved and very much appreciated coffee break, Mark Owen (Taylor Wessing) took over the chair and introduced Kenneth Wilton (Seyfarth Shaw LLP). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Schachtman
Schwarzenegger, 556 F.3d 950 (9th Cir. 2009) Vinyl Chloride Taylor v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
The judge, Justice Bennett, considered the application utilising the principles laid down by Gummow and Hayne JJ in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 at [65], quoting Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618 at 622-623 (per Kitto, Taylor, Menzies and Owen JJ), and accordingly asked whether the plaintiff had: (1) made out a prima facie case; and (2) addressed where the balance of convenience lay? [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
 heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 Nov [read post]