Search for: "P. v. Hammer" Results 21 - 40 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
A, as well as Nurse D., Therapist I., Technologist P., and Physician Liaison X? [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 4:04 am
He queries: "What about a second appeal by me to the House of Lords following the precedent set by Buttes Gas v Hammer [1982] AC 888 (see here), with the House of Lords granting me leave to appeal and then choosing to follow the European Patent Officeapproach (particularly now that the Technical Appeal Board has asserted in T 154/04 has asserted, in robust terms, their view that Jacob LJ was quite wrong, and given detail as to how they think he got it so wrong)? [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am by MOTP
P. 166a(f) ("Sworn or certified copies of all papers or parts thereof referred to in an affidavit shall be attached thereto or served therewith. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
You can read the underlying opinion here.The Court granted discretionary review without oral argument in the following cases:Murray Hammer v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:57 am by Jennifer Davis
Section 94B(2) states that: “despite the appeals process not having been begun or…exhausted, refusing P entry to, removing P from or requiring P to leave the United Kingdom…would not be unlawful. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:28 pm by Administrator
   In his column of October 18, 2010, he writes about the implications of Berry & Murphy, P.C. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:46 am by David Oliver
 The district court in The Security National Bank of Sioux City, Iowa v. [read post]