Search for: "P. v. Marks"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
Following an adverse ruling by the General Court in Case T-221/12, Sunrider has launched an appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union in what is now renumbered as Case C-142/14 P The Sunrider Corporation v OHIM. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:03 am
Brannon P. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:59 pm
Monsanto Co., with Mark P. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:46 pm
Southco, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:51 am
For publication opinions today (4): In Mark P. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
As the CJEU’s case law proves, such requirement applies to any kind of trade mark which is indistinguishable from the appearance of the products, be it a three-dimensional trade mark [Procter & Gamble v OHIM, Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P; Mag Instrument v OHIM, Case C-136/02 P and Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, Case C-173/04 P), a… [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 2:26 pm
A comparison of the parties’ design marks is below: Source: Op. p. 1. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 2:26 pm
A comparison of the parties’ design marks is below: Source: Op. p. 1. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 6:03 am
Opinion, at pp. 2-3 (citing Couture v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:46 am
Appliance Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:43 am
Thus, when evaluating the marks in their entireties, the marks were not likely to be confused. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:51 am
Rogers v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:50 am
Motion to transfer later denied (the only Marshall false marking case in which a motion to transfer was denied) – order signed granting D’s motion to dismiss P’s complaint on 4/6/11. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:39 pm
This is an action for annulment brought by the owner of the national word mark TOSCA for perfumes against the Board of Appeal's dismissal of an appeal from the Opposition Division, which rejected its opposition against the application for registration of the word mark TOSKA for goods in Class 18* Confusingly similar but actually quite different is Case T-150/04 Mülhens v OHIM - Minoronzoni (TOSCA BLU). [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 8:58 am
The case is Mark P'Pool v. [read post]
Recent Decision Highlights Importance of Pleading Compliance with the Federal Patent Marking Statute
26 Apr 2019, 6:16 am
Del.), D.I. 14 at p. 7. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:45 am
In his article, "Queer Trademarks," Michael P. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 5:45 pm
Entre el público invitado se encontraban: el presidente del Senado, Eduardo Bhatia; la directora administrativa de la Oficina de Administración de los Tribunales (OAT), la licenciada Sonia Ivette Vélez Colón y el representante por el Partido Popular Democrático (PPD), Manuel Natal. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
P. 9(b) standard in Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
