Search for: "PBA v. City of NY"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2012, 11:29 am
Citing Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Pub. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
Any expansion of benefits available pursuant to §§207-a and 207-c must be expressly provided for in a collective bargaining agreementMatter of Town of Tuxedo v Town of Tuxedo Police Benevolent Assn., 2010 NY Slip Op 08122, decided on November 9, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentOn December 4, 2004, Town of Tuxedo Police Officer John Tamburello was injured in the line of duty. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Under certain circumstances, a municipality may modify or discontinue providing health insurance benefits to retirees Matter of Kapell v Incorporated Village of Greenport, 2009 NY Slip Op 05134, decided on June 16, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentDavid E. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
At a time when so many communities are struggling to give meaning to the 50-year-old promise of Gideon v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:32 am
Discontinuing certain disability benefitsTown of Cortland v PERB, NYS Supreme Court, [Not selected for publications in the Official Reports]The Town of Cortland unilaterally adopted policies and procedures that terminated certain benefits that were being paid to police officers disabled in the line of duty if they had received such benefits for more than one year. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
"The court also noted that the Village was not barred by the doctrine of equitable estoppel from terminating Plaintiff’s post-retirement health care benefits.In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals concluded that "there is no legal impediment to the municipality's unilateral alteration of the past practice" regarding its providing health insurance benefits to its retirees and their dependents where there was neither a… [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In Burnham and UFT, 28 PERB 4590, PERB ruled that the union's "duty of fair representation" runs only to employees; there is no such duty with respect to former unit members such as retirees [See, also, McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326; Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344].** Retirees are not employees for the purposes of collective bargaining for the purposes of Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [the Taylor Law] The decision… [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:55 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
On October 2, 2020, Supreme Court denied defendants' motion (2020 NY Slip Op 33260[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2020]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
On October 2, 2020, Supreme Court denied defendants' motion (2020 NY Slip Op 33260[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2020]). [read post]
