Search for: "PRACTICAL POLITICAL CONSULTING INC V SECRETARY OF STATE" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
I have linked each company name to its corresponding record at the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office (or Secretary of the Commonwealth - whatever). [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
  The evidence showed that from 1996 through September 2000, Edwards, the founder of ETS Payphones, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The judgement of HHJ Moloney QC in the curious international harassment case of Power Places Tours Inc & Ors v Free Spirit [2015] EWHC 3886 (QB) given on 10 December 20 [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
A new book Privacy Injunctions and the Media: A Practice Manual by Iain Goldrein QC has been published. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm by Mandelman
  Mandelman, Inc. lost all rights and powers for failure to meet statutory filing requirements of either the Secretary of State’s office or the Franchise Tax Board.Agent for Service of Process Okay, Mandelman Inc. was a corporation I used to do some publishing and consulting under, although I haven’t done such work in quite some time… maybe 8-10 years. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Speaker: José Miguel Insulza (Secretary General, Organization of American States). 2-5 p.m. ? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:17 am by Kevin LaCroix
Secretary State for Justice, seeks to assuage businesses that the parameters of the Act are not intended to prohibit reasonable client development activities: "Rest assured, -- no one wants to stop firms getting to know their clients by taking them to events like Wimbledon or the Grand Prix. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Mandelman
 It’s obviously anything but an isolated incident… plainly, as practices go, it is ubiquitous. [read post]