Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
But that is precisely what we have witnessed on campuses across the country (e.g., University of Michigan and NYU). [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:19 am
See Weinberger v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Firm leadership may openly discuss among its personnel what went wrong; use the underlying violations as an opportunity to teach and instill in all staff the critical importance of professional integrity, ethics, and serving the public trust; and possibly internally sanction, terminate, or suspend the audit partner. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
These include the development of “softlaw”, but also the increasingly present dimension of guidance and planning: environ-mental law, which is obviously of particular interest to us here abounds in programmes,schemes, plans, etc.In short, we must be open to accept that potentially, all forms of legal normativitycould be mobilised to mitigate climate change.II. [read post]
9 May 2024, 3:59 pm
Even so, the Supreme Court has required that Congress provide a "sufficiently definite and precise" standard that can "enable Congress, the courts and the public to ascertain whether the [Executive official] . . . has conformed to those standards. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am
WCAG 2.1 AA allows alternate conforming versions precisely because the best technical minds in the world think it can be done. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:24 pm
Simplot Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am
It is a standard form of extortion of celebrities. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:02 am
” Hapney v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
This is the standard applied to content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
This is the standard applied to content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Such issues were precisely raised in a 2006 ruling (albeit one that was later vacated as moot, which eliminates any precedential value) from the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
But he maintained that there was enough private conduct to allow the charges against Trump to go forward even under that standard. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:28 am
ShareThe oral argument Tuesday in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are generally accepted techniques that are part of a scientific approach to causal inference, but each has standards, predicates, and requirements for valid use. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
” The federal duty imposed by EMTALA to provide this standard of care for complications from pregnancy is now threatened by state abortion bans enacted after Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:43 pm
Cases such as R v De Vos have attempted to apply this standard. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
This may be used to defeat future claims without even engaging with the question of justification. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
And that’s precisely what I’d like to do this afternoon. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
’”) When jeerers become obstructers, they are different from “supporters who cheer the speaker,” because (presumably) the supporters are not cheering so loudly precisely when the speaker is speaking that the speaker cannot be heard, and therefore are not interfering with the speaker’s ability to communicate her message and be heard by willing listeners. [read post]
