Search for: "Parks v. Social Security Administration"
Results 21 - 40
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
She named the State of Kansas, the state Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, social workers and their supervisors and the state court judge who ruled on the "Child in Need of Care" (CINC) matter relating to all three children and the adoption proceeding of her grandson "C.W. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 19, 2011Briscoe v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
He was not laid off in 2005, and in late 2004 or early 2005, the employee received a letter from the Social Security Administration stating that his name and SSN did not match its records. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Access to recorded classes will be controlled via a secure course management platform, such as ANGEL, and will be restricted to students enrolled in the recorded course, the professor, and those University IIT personnel necessary to maintain the system. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:15 am
John, 597 F.3d 263, (5th Cir. 2010)); a Social Security Administration employee who accessed former girlfriends' addresses to solicit their affections (United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:11 am
Mark MacCarthy handicaps the Epic v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 4:26 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:50 am
The various monies handed over to the Chapter by its members helped to fund something of a social program, subsidizing gun purchases, bonds for jailed gang members, gang security, presumably escalating funeral costs, and the like. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:38 pm
” Citing McIntyre v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
While his administrative appeal was pending*Firefighter was granted performance-of-duty disability retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §363-c and retired.The Village stopped paying Firefighter any benefits. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
Part of the West Bank Security Barrier In the north, you can stand in an Israeli neighborhood park and look up at the yellow Hezbollah flag on the hilltop just over the border with Lebanon. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:01 am
Simply because the Social Security Administration has determined that a person is disabled does not necessarily mean that the person is incapable of performing everyday tasks. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am
So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
Sweet was determined to be disabled by the Social Security Administration and at trial was collecting Social Security Disability (“SSD”) benefits of $681 per month. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals sustained the Workers’ Compensation Board's ruling that Officer was engaged in a "special errand" at the time he was injured and thus eligible for Workers' Compensation benefits.* See Retirement and Social Security Law §363-c[b][1].The Claimant's decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_09079.htm [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
(Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg) The Supreme Court has just agreed to hear Packingham v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
Surveillance The Local had a piece “Drones and surveillance cameras: France’s new security bill explained”. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
Lebous [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]The general guideline followed by court is considering an appeal from an administrative decision is that the court must confirm an administrative decision if there exists a rational basis for the determination, applying the standard set by the Court of Appeals in Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
