Search for: "Payment v. Payment et al" Results 21 - 40 of 2,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2015, 6:21 am by Wally Zimolong
In Scungio Borst & Associates v. 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLC, et. al., a divided Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled that an individual owner and agent of a real estate developer was not personally liable for Payment Act damages owed to a general contractor. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Last week, in Federal Trade Commission v Actavis Inc. et Al., the US Supreme Court turned its attention to a fascinating crossroad of IP and competition law, reverse payment settlements. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 7:25 am by Docket Navigator
Chicago Transit Authority et al, 1-14-cv-08053 (ILND July 10, 2015, Order) (Chang, J.) [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:25 am by Daily Record Staff
If the three written documents are considered to form a single, unified contractual relationship, an ambiguity in the payment term of one ... [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 11:02 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
In the nonfinal order that is the subject of this appeal, the circuit court concluded that Grice Engineering was in default for failure to make payments required under the asset purchase [...] [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:38 pm by Kim Krawiec
American Society for Reproductive Medicine et al., No. 11 CV 1781, complaint filed (N.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 10:01 am by Diana L. Skaggs
Cabinet for Health and Family Services, et al, 2009-CA-001279-ME Issue:  Disabled SSI recipient held in contempt and ordered to pay child support or go to jail. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 12:12 pm by Daily Record Staff
Vol.), if an employer or its insurer does not begin to make payments of a workers’ compensation award within a specified period of time, the Workers’ Compensation ... [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:45 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
United States Department of Health and Human Services et al., in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (No.1:16-cv-00878). [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Matt C. Bailey
The California Supreme Court has issued a Notice that it will be issuing its opinion in Kwikset Corp. et al. v. [read post]